Advertisement

Efficacy and Safety of Surgical Treatments for Neurogenic Stress Urinary Incontinence in Adults: A Systematic Review

Published:September 08, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2021.08.007

      Abstract

      Context

      Controversy still exists regarding the balance of benefits and harms for the different surgical options for neurogenic stress urinary incontinence (N-SUI).

      Objective

      To identify which surgical option for N-SUI offers the highest cure rate and best safety without compromising urinary tract function and bladder management.

      Evidence acquisition

      A systematic review was performed under the auspices of the European Association of Urology Guidelines Office and the European Association of Urology Neuro-Urology Guidelines Panel according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement.

      Evidence synthesis

      A total of 32 studies were included. Overall, 852 neurourological patients were surgically treated for N-SUI. The treatment offered most often (13/32 studies) was an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS; 49%, 416/852) and was associated with a need for reintervention in one-third of patients. More than 200 surgical revisions were described. Overall, 146/852 patients (17%) received concomitant bladder augmentation, mainly during placement of an AUS (42%, 62/146) or autologous sling (34% of women and 14% of men). Following pubovaginal sling placement, dryness was achieved in 83% of cases. A significant improvement in N-SUI was observed in 87% (82/94) of women following placement of a synthetic midurethral sling. Efficacy after insertion of an adjustable continence therapy device (ACT 40%, proACT 60%) was reported for 38/128 cases (30%). The cure rate for bulking agents was 35% (9/25) according to 2/32 studies, mainly among men (90%). The risk of bias was highly relevant. Baseline and postoperative cystometry were missing in 13 and 28 studies, respectively.

      Conclusions

      The evidence is mainly reported in retrospective studies. More than one intervention is often required to achieve continence because of coexisting neurogenic detrusor overactivity, low compliance, or the onset of complications in the medium and long term. Urodynamic data are needed to better clarify the success of N-SUI treatment with the different techniques.

      Patient summary

      Our review shows that insertion of an artificial urinary sphincter for urinary incontinence is effective but is highly associated with a need for repeat surgery. Other surgical options may have lower continence rates or a risk of requiring intermittent catheterization, which patients should be informed about before deciding on surgery for their incontinence.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to European Urology Focus
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Farag F.
        • Koens M.
        • Sievert K.D.
        • et al.
        Surgical treatment of neurogenic stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review of quality assessment and surgical outcomes.
        Neurourol Urodyn. 2016; 35: 21-25https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22682
        • Reuvers S.H.M.
        • Groen J.
        • Scheepe J.R.
        • et al.
        Heterogeneity in reporting on urinary outcome and cure after surgical interventions for stress urinary incontinence in adult neuro-urological patients: a systematic review.
        Neurourol Urodyn. 2018; 37: 554-565https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23364
        • Apostolidis A.
        • Drake M.J.
        • Emmanuel A.
        • et al.
        Neurologic urinary and faecal incontinence.
        in: Abrams P. Cardozo L. Khoury S. Wein A. Incontinence: Proceedings of the Sixth International Consultation on Incontinence, Tokyo2017: 1093-1308
        • Blok B.
        • Castro-Diaz D.
        • Del Popolo G.
        • et al.
        EAU guidelines on neuro-urology.
        European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands2020
        • Musco S.
        • Padilla-Fernández B.
        • Del Popolo G.
        • et al.
        Value of urodynamic findings in predicting upper urinary tract damage in neuro-urological patients: a systematic review.
        Neurourol Urodyn. 2018; 37: 1522-1540https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23501
        • Moher D.
        • Liberati A.
        • Tetzlaff J.
        • et al.
        Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
        BMJ. 2009; 339: b2535https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
        • Groen L.A.
        • Spinoit A.F.
        • Hoebeke P.
        • et al.
        The AdVance male sling as a minimally invasive treatment for intrinsic sphincter deficiency in patients with neurogenic bladder sphincter dysfunction: a pilot study.
        Neurourol Urodyn. 2012; 31: 1284-1287https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.21256
        • Ronzi Y.
        • Le Normand L.
        • Chartier-Kastler E.
        • et al.
        Neurogenic stress urinary incontinence: is there a place for adjustable continence therapy (ACTTM and ProACTTM, Uromedica, Plymouth, MN, USA)? A retrospective multicenter study.
        Spinal Cord. 2019; 57: 388-395https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-018-0219-3
        • Pannek J.
        • Wöllner J.
        Treatment of stress urinary incontinence in men with spinal cord injury: minimally invasive=minimally effective?.
        Spinal Cord. 2017; 55: 739-742https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2017.16
        • Bennett J.K.
        • Green B.G.
        • Foote J.E.
        • et al.
        Collagen injections for intrinsic sphincter deficiency in the neuropathic urethra.
        Paraplegia. 1995; 33: 697-700https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1995.146
        • El-Azab A.S.
        • El-Nashar S.A.
        Midurethral slings versus the standard pubovaginal slings for women with neurogenic stress urinary incontinence.
        Int Urogynecol J. 2015; 26: 427-432https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2521-8
        • Lai H.H.
        • Hsu E.I.
        • Teh B.S.
        • et al.
        13 years of experience with artificial urinary sphincter implantation at Baylor College of Medicine.
        J Urol. 2007; 177: 1021-1025https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.062
        • Phé V.
        • Léon P.
        • Granger B.
        • et al.
        Stress urinary incontinence in female neurological patients: long-term functional outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter (AMS 800TM) implantation.
        Neurourol Urodyn. 2017; 36: 764-769https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23019
        • Mor Y.
        • Leibovitch I.
        • Golomb J.
        • et al.
        Reconstruction du bas appareil urinaire par entérocystoplastie d’agrandissement et mise en place isolée d’une manchette de sphincter artificiel [Lower urinary tract reconstruction by augmentation cystoplasty and insertion of artificial urinary sphincter cuff only: long term follow-up].
        Prog Urol. 2004; 14: 310-314
        • Vainrib M.
        • Reyblat P.
        • Ginsberg D.
        Outcomes of male sling mesh kit placement in patients with neuropathic stress urinary incontinence: a single institution experience.
        Urol Int. 2015; 95: 406-410https://doi.org/10.1159/000381880
        • Fulford S.C.
        • Sutton C.
        • Bales G.
        • Hickling M.
        • Stephenson T.P.
        The fate of the ‘modern’ artificial urinary sphincter with a follow-up of more than 10 years.
        Br J Urol. 1997; 79: 713-716https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.00151.x
        • Light J.K.
        • Scott F.B.
        Use of the artificial urinary sphincter in spinal cord injury patients.
        J Urol. 1983; 130: 1127-1129https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)51719-x
        • Ramsay A.K.
        • Granitsiotis P.
        • Conn I.G.
        The use of the artificial urinary sphincter in the West of Scotland: a single centre 10-year experience.
        Scott Med J. 2007; 52: 14-17https://doi.org/10.1258/rsmsmj.52.2.14
        • Bersch U.
        • Göcking K.
        • Pannek J.
        The artificial urinary sphincter in patients with spinal cord lesion: description of a modified technique and clinical results.
        Eur Urol. 2009; 55: 687-693https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.046
        • Castro Díaz D.
        • Ravina Pisaca M.
        • Díaz García J.L.
        • et al.
        El esfínter urinario artificial en el tratamiento de la incontinencia urinaria por incompetencia esfinteriana [Artificial urinary sphincter in the treatment of urinary incontinence caused by sphincter insufficiency].
        Arch Esp Urol. 1997; 50: 595-601
        • Costa P.
        • Poinas G.
        • Ben Naoum K.
        • et al.
        Long-term results of artificial urinary sphincter for women with type III stress urinary incontinence.
        Eur Urol. 2013; 63: 753-758https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.008
        • Guillot-Tantay C.
        • Chartier-Kastler E.
        • Mozer P.
        • et al.
        Traitement de l’incontinence urinaire masculine neurologique par le sphincter urinaire artificiel AMS 800TM (Boston Scientific, Boston, États-Unis): résultats à très long terme (&25 ans) [Male neurogenic stress urinary incontinence treated with artificial urinary sphincter AMS 800TM (Boston Scientific, Boston, USA): very long-term results (&25 years)].
        Prog Urol. 2018; 28: 39-47https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2017.09.012
        • Chartier-Kastler E.
        • Genevois S.
        • Gamé X.
        • et al.
        Treatment of neurogenic male urinary incontinence related to intrinsic sphincter insufficiency with an artificial urinary sphincter: a French retrospective multicentre study.
        BJU Int. 2011; 107: 426-432https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09501.x
        • Khene Z.E.
        • Paret F.
        • Perrouin-Verbe M.A.
        • et al.
        Artificial urinary sphincter in male patients with spina bifida: comparison of perioperative and functional outcomes between bulbar urethra and bladder neck cuff placement.
        J Urol. 2018; 199: 791-797https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.09.140
        • Tricard T.
        • Schirmann A.
        • Munier P.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter in female with neurological stress urinary incontinence: a long-term follow-up.
        World J Urol. 2021; 39: 157-162https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03105-2
        • Losco G.S.
        • Burki J.R.
        • Omar Y.A.
        • et al.
        Long-term outcome of transobturator tape (TOT) for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in females with neuropathic bladders.
        Spinal Cord. 2015; 53: 544-546https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2015.70
        • Daneshmand S.
        • Ginsberg D.A.
        • Bennet J.K.
        • et al.
        Puboprostatic sling repair for treatment of urethral incompetence in adult neurogenic incontinence.
        J Urol. 2003; 169: 199-202https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64067-0
        • Abdul-Rahman A.
        • Attar K.H.
        • Hamid R.
        • et al.
        Long-term outcome of tension-free vaginal tape for treating stress incontinence in women with neuropathic bladders.
        BJU Int. 2010; 106: 827-830https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09203.x
        • Sakalis V.I.
        • Floyd Jr., M.S.
        • Caygill P.
        • et al.
        Management of stress urinary incontinence in spinal cord injured female patients with a mid-urethral tape – a single center experience.
        J Spinal Cord Med. 2018; 41: 703-709https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2017.1393190
        • Fontaine E.
        • Bendaya S.
        • Desert J.F.
        • et al.
        Combined modified rectus fascial sling and augmentation ileocystoplasty for neurogenic incontinence in women.
        J Urol. 1997; 157: 109-112
        • Athanasopoulos A.
        • Gyftopoulos K.
        • McGuire E.J.
        Treating stress urinary incontinence in female patients with neuropathic bladder: the value of the autologous fascia rectus sling.
        Int Urol Nephrol. 2012; 44: 1363-1367https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-012-0247-4
        • Chancellor M.B.
        • Erhard M.J.
        • Kiilholma P.J.
        • Karasick S.
        • Rivas D.A.
        Functional urethral closure with pubovaginal sling for destroyed female urethra after long-term urethral catheterization.
        Urology. 1994; 43: 499-505https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(94)90241-0
        • Schmidbauer C.P.
        • Chiang H.
        • Raz S.
        Chirurgische Behandlungsmöglichkeiten schwerster Harninkontinenz bei Frauen [Surgical treatment possibilities for severe urinary incontinence in women].
        Urologe A. 1988; 27: 291-296
        • Herschorn S.
        • Radomski S.B.
        Fascial slings and bladder neck tapering in the treatment of male neurogenic incontinence.
        J Urol. 1992; 147: 1073-1075https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37474-8
        • Wu S.Y.
        • Jiang Y.H.
        • Kuo H.C.
        Therapeutic efficacy of a new procedure for male urinary incontinence combining a suburethral polypropylene mesh and cardiovascular patch.
        Int Neurourol J. 2017; 21: 38-45https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.1732638.319
        • Hamid R.
        • Arya M.
        • Khastgir J.
        • et al.
        The treatment of male stress urinary incontinence with polydimethylsiloxane in compliant bladders following spinal cord injury.
        Spinal Cord. 2003; 41: 286-289https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101455
        • Kaboré F.A.
        • Gaillet S.
        • Blanc J.
        • et al.
        Résultats initiaux de l’utilisation des ballons périurétraux ajustables (ACTTM et pro ACTTM) dans le traitement de l’incontinence urinaire d’effort par insuffisance sphinctérienne de l’adulte [Initial results of adjustable periurethral balloons (ACTTM and pro ACTTM) in the treatment of adult stress urinary incontinence with intrinsic sphincter deficiency].
        Prog Urol. 2014; 24: 1132-1138https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2014.08.004
        • Ammirati E.
        • Manassero A.
        • Giammò A.
        • et al.
        Management of male and female neurogenic stress urinary incontinence in spinal cord injured (SCI) patients using adjustable continence therapy.
        Urologia. 2017; 84: 165-168https://doi.org/10.5301/uj.5000242
        • Mehnert U.
        • Bastien L.
        • Denys P.
        • et al.
        Treatment of neurogenic stress urinary incontinence using an adjustable continence device: 4-year followup.
        J Urol. 2012; 188: 2274-2280https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.131