Advertisement

Using Competing Risk of Mortality to Inform the Transition from Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance to Watchful Waiting

Published:August 02, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2021.07.003

      Abstract

      Background

      For men on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PCa), disease progression and age-related changes in health may influence decisions about pursuing curative treatment.

      Objective

      To evaluate the predicted PCa and non-PCa mortality at the time of reclassification among men on AS, to identify clinical criteria for considering a transition from AS to watchful waiting (WW).

      Design, setting, and participants

      Patients enrolled in a large AS program who experienced biopsy grade reclassification (Gleason grade increase) were retrospectively examined. All patients who had complete documentation of medical comorbidities at reclassification were included.

      Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

      A validated model was used to assess 10- and 15-yr untreated PCa and non-PCa mortalities based on patient comorbidities and PCa clinical characteristics. We compared the ratio of predicted PCa mortality with predicted non-PCa mortality (“predicted mortality ratio”) and divided patients into four risk tiers based on this ratio: (1) tier 1 (ratio: >0.33), (2) tier 2 (ratio 0.33–0.20), (3) tier 3 (ratio 0.20–0.10), and (4) tier 4 (ratio <0.10).

      Results and limitations

      Of the 344 men who were reclassified, 98 (28%) were in risk tier 1, 85 (25%) in tier 2, 93 (27%) in tier 3, and 68 (20%) in tier 4 for 10-yr mortality. Fifteen-year risk tiers were distributed similarly. The 23 (6.7%) men who met the “transition triad” (age >75 yr, Charlson Comorbidity Index >3, and grade group ≤2) had a 14-fold higher non-PCa mortality risk and a lower predicted mortality ratio than those who did not (0.07 vs 0.23, p < 0.001). The primary limitations of our study included its retrospective nature and the use of predicted mortalities.

      Conclusions

      At reclassification, nearly half of patients had a more than five-fold and one in five patients had a more than ten-fold higher risk of non-PCa death than patients having a risk of untreated PCa death. Despite a more significant cancer diagnosis, a transition to WW for older men with multiple comorbidities and grade group <3 PCa should be considered.

      Patient summary

      Men with favorable-risk prostate cancer and life expectancy of >10 yr are often enrolled in active surveillance, which entails delay of curative treatment until there is evidence of more aggressive disease. We examined a group of men on active surveillance who developed more aggressive disease, and found, nevertheless, that the majority of these men continued to have a dramatically higher risk of death from non–prostate cancer causes than from prostate cancer based on a risk prediction tool. For men older than 75 yr, who have multiple medical conditions and who do not have higher-grade cancer, it may be reasonable to reconsider the need for curative treatment given the low risk of death from prostate cancer compared with the risk of death from other causes.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to European Urology Focus
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Howlander N.
        • Noone A.
        • Krapcho M.
        • et al.
        SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2016.
        National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD2016
        • Schröder F.H.
        • Hugosson J.
        • Roobol M.J.
        • et al.
        Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up.
        N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 981-990
        • Etzioni R.
        • Tsodikov A.
        • Mariotto A.
        • et al.
        Quantifying the role of PSA screening in the US prostate cancer mortality decline.
        Cancer Causes Control. 2008; 19: 175-181
        • Etzioni R.
        • Penson D.F.
        • Legler J.M.
        • et al.
        Overdiagnosis due to prostate-specific antigen screening: lessons from U.S. prostate cancer incidence trends.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002; 94: 981-990
        • Barry M.J.
        Screening for prostate cancer—the controversy that refuses to die.
        N Engl J Med. 2009; 360: 1351-1354
        • Loeb S.
        • Bjurlin M.A.
        • Nicholson J.
        • et al.
        Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer.
        Eur Urol. 2014; 65: 1046-1055
        • Tosoian J.J.
        • Carter H.B.
        • Lepor A.
        • Loeb S.
        Active surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practice.
        Nat Rev Urol. 2016; 13: 205-215
        • Dall’Era M.A.
        • Albertsen P.C.
        • Bangma C.
        • et al.
        Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature.
        Eur Urol. 2012; 62: 976-983
        • Volpe A.
        • Cadeddu J.A.
        • Cestari A.
        • et al.
        Contemporary management of small renal masses.
        Eur Urol. 2011; 60: 501-515
        • Bellardita L.
        • Valdagni R.
        • Van Den Bergh R.
        • et al.
        How does active surveillance for prostate cancer affect quality of life? A systematic review.
        Eur Urol. 2015; 67: 637-645
        • Mahal B.A.
        • Butler S.
        • Franco I.
        • et al.
        Use of active surveillance or watchful waiting for low-risk prostate cancer and management trends across risk groups in the United States, 2010–2015.
        JAMA. 2019; 321: 704-706
        • Mohler J.L.
        • Antonarakis E.S.
        • Armstrong A.J.
        • et al.
        Prostate cancer, version 2.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology.
        J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2019; 17: 479-505
        • Sammon J.D.
        • Abdollah F.
        • D’Amico A.
        • et al.
        Predicting life expectancy in men diagnosed with prostate cancer.
        Eur Urol. 2015; 68: 756-765
        • Walz J.
        • Gallina A.
        • Perrotte P.
        • et al.
        Clinicians are poor raters of life-expectancy before radical prostatectomy or definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.
        BJU Int. 2007; 100: 1254-1258
        • Krahn M.D.
        • Bremner K.E.
        • Asaria J.
        • et al.
        The ten-year rule revisited: accuracy of clinicians’ estimates of life expectancy in patients with localized prostate cancer.
        Urology. 2002; 60: 258-263
        • Wilt T.J.
        • Jones K.M.
        • Barry M.J.
        • et al.
        Follow-up of prostatectomy versus observation for early prostate cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 2017; 377: 132-142
        • Kent M.
        • Penson D.F.
        • Albertsen P.C.
        • et al.
        Successful external validation of a model to predict other cause mortality in localized prostate cancer.
        BMC Med. 2016; 14: 25
      1. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Male life expectancy survey. https://webcore.mskcc.org/survey/surveyform.aspx?preview=true&excelsurveylistid=4.

        • Charlson M.
        • Szatrowski T.P.
        • Peterson J.
        • Gold J.
        Validation of a combined comorbidity index.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1994; 47: 1245-1251
        • Daskivich T.J.
        • Lai J.
        • Dick A.W.
        • et al.
        Questioning the 10-year life expectancy rule for high-grade prostate cancer: comparative effectiveness of aggressive vs nonaggressive treatment of high-grade disease in older men with differing comorbid disease burdens.
        Urology. 2016; 93: 68-76
        • Albertsen P.C.
        • Moore D.F.
        • Shih W.
        • Lin Y.
        • Li H.
        • Lu-Yao G.L.
        Impact of comorbidity on survival among men with localized prostate cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29: 1335-1341
        • Vickers A.
        • Bennette C.
        • Steineck G.
        • et al.
        Individualized estimation of the benefit of radical prostatectomy: data from SPCG4, the Scandinavian randomized trial of radical prostatectomy.
        J Urol. 2012; 62: 204-209
        • Albertsen P.C.
        • Hanley J.A.
        • Fine J.
        • Carroll P.R.
        20-Year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer.
        Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig. 2005; 23: 459-460
        • Wilson J.R.M.
        • Clarke M.G.
        • Ewings P.
        • Graham J.D.
        • MacDonagh R.
        The assessment of patient life-expectancy: how accurate are urologists and oncologists?.
        BJU Int. 2005; 95: 794-798
        • Egger S.J.
        • Calopedos R.J.
        • O’Connell D.L.
        • Chambers S.K.
        • Woo H.H.
        • Smith D.P.
        Long-term psychological and quality-of-life effects of active surveillance and watchful waiting after diagnosis of low-risk localised prostate cancer.
        Eur Urol. 2018; 73: 859-867
        • Weiner A.B.
        • Li E.V.
        • Desai A.S.
        • Press D.J.
        • Schaeffer E.M.
        Cause of death during prostate cancer survivorship: a contemporary, US population-based analysis.
        Cancer. 2021; 127: 2895-2904
        • Loeb S.
        • Zhou Q.
        • Siebert U.
        • et al.
        Active surveillance versus watchful waiting for localized prostate cancer: a model to inform decisions.
        Eur Urol. 2017; 72: 899-907
        • Loeb S.
        • Vellekoop A.
        • Ahmed H.U.
        • et al.
        Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy.
        Eur Urol. 2013; 64: 876-892
        • Singhal U.
        • Tosoian J.J.
        • Qi J.
        • et al.
        Overtreatment and underutilization of watchful waiting in men with limited life expectancy: an analysis of the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative Registry.
        Urology. 2020; 145: 190-196
        • Guzzo T.J.
        • Dluzniewski P.
        • Orosco R.
        • Platz E.A.
        • Partin A.W.
        • Han M.
        Prediction of mortality after radical prostatectomy by Charlson Comorbidity Index.
        Urology. 2010; 76: 553-557